STORY
Tim Chester, September 2008
The Bible is a story and much of it is made up of stories. If you asked an ancient Israelite about
God they would have told you the story of the exodus. Story-telling was built into the fabric of
their lives (e.g. Joshua 4:4-7). Jesus taught using stories and many of the speeches in Acts are
in the form of story. Moreover people engage and learn well through stories – especially nonbook
people. If we are to allow the genres of Scripture to shape our teaching then stories will
be a significant part of our communication. See also Deuteronomy 1-4; Joshua 4:21-22; Psalm
78:1-4; Mark 4:1, 2, 34; John 20:30-31; Romans 15:4; 1 Corinthians 10:11; 2 Peter 1:16.
‘Storying’ can be used in a variety of contexts.
Ad Hoc Evangelism
It can be used in ad hoc in evangelism. For example, the story of Zacchaeus could be told in a
conversation about corruption. John Drane proposes the importance of using three kinds of
stories in evangelism: God’s story; individual Bible stories; and personal stories.1
Systematic Evangelism
Stories can also be used systematically in evangelism. ‘Chronological Bible storying’ is a
growing model used in mission around the world. It identifies bridges and barriers to belief
within a culture and then identifies an appropriate ‘story set’ to connect with the bridges and
address the barriers. ‘Each story lesson model must be crafted for addressing worldview
issues in culturally acceptable methods to the end that biblical truths speak clearly to a
particular group of listeners.’2 In this context, it is common for storytellers not to anticipate
the future of the story as they go along, specially not talking about Jesus until we reach Jesus
in the story.
Ad Hoc Pastoral Care and Discipleship
Stories can be used informally in pastoral care and discipleship.
Systematic Training and Leadership Development
People also create ‘story sets’ discipleship and leadership training. In a North African Muslimdominated
country, seventeen young men (many of whom could barely read and write and
some not at all) underwent a two-year leader training program using chronological Bible
storying. At the end of two years, students mastered approximately 135 biblical stories in their
correct chronological order, spanning Genesis to Revelation. They were able to tell the stories,
compose from one to five songs for each story and enact dramas about each of the stories. A
seminary professor gave them a six-hour oral exam. They demonstrated the ability to answer
questions about both the facts and theology of the stories and showed an excellent grasp of
the gospel message, the nature of God and their new life in Christ. The students quickly and
skilfully referred to the stories to answer a variety of theological questions.
Bible Teaching
Story can also be used as one way of teaching the Bible in the context of a church gathering,
especially the seventy percent of the Bible that is narrative.
Oral Culture
Scholars estimate literacy in Israel and Greece in the New Testament era was three to twelve
1 John Drane, Faith in a Changing Culture, Zondervan, 1997.
2 J. O. Terry, Basic Bible Storying, Church Starting Network, 2006, 3.
2
percent, most likely around five percent. By 1750 only ten percent of world population was
literate. Today fifty percent of USA’s population prefer a non-literate approach to learning and
decision-making. Half of these are illiterate.3 People are now talking of a growing ‘secondary
oral culture’ tied to electronic media. People may have learned to read, but get most of the
important information in their lives through stories via radio, TV, cinema and the internet.
Primary Oral Communicators
People who cannot read or write and depend entirely on oral and visual media.
Functional Non-Literates
People who have some reading and writing ability but, due to their limited literacy and
education, rely mainly on orality to function in everyday life.
(‘The danger for literate Bible teachers is to assume that because functional non-literates
can read some that they can learn well from written materials or from oral materials that
are organised in literate prepositional manner.’)
Semi-Literates
People who can function as literates in their society, but are unable profitably to handle
texts and are uncomfortable analysing text or listing propositions.
Literates
People who can read a recent Bible translation, gain understanding, make notes and
organise ideas.
Highly Literates
People who have above average literacy skills through advanced study.
(‘In my own experience I have found that many leaders who are highly literate and have
received advanced theological training have great difficulty in communicating to those of
lesser literacy.’)4
Oral learners can handle most thoughts, ideas, concepts, principles or teaching that a literate
can handle, if it is properly clothed within a story. Literate learners often want to reduce a
story to its ‘gist’ or ‘core message’.
What are these?
Oral learners tend to name geometric patterns by what they resemble: plate, box, tray, piece
of pie. Those with even a small amount of education name them as circle, square, triangle – all
learned conceptual ideas.
Which of these is the odd one out?
A ‘group of tools’ is conceptual thinking. An oral learner thinks in situational terms of the
context in which the objects are used. A 25-year-old illiterate peasant said: ‘They’re all alike.
The saw will saw the log and the hatchet will chop it into small pieces. If one of these has to
go, I’d throw out the hatchet. It doesn’t do as good a job as a saw.’ Told that the hammer, saw
and hatchet are all tools, he discounts the categorical class and persists in situational thinking:
‘Yes, but even if we have tools, we still need wood – otherwise we can’t build anything’.5
3 Mark Snowden, ‘Orality: The Next Wave of Mission Advance,’ Mission Frontiers, Jan-Feb 2004.
4 From J. O. Terry, Basic Bible Storying, 19-20.
5 From Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy, Routledge, 1982.
3
‘Illiterates have difficulty in articulate self-analysis. Self analysis … calls for isolation of the
self… A 38 year old man, illiterate, from a mountain pasture camp was asked “What sort of a
person are you, what’s your character like, what are your good qualities and short comings?
How would you describe yourself? “I came here from Uch-Kurgan, I was very poor, and now I
am married and have children”… Oral communication unites people in groups. Writing and
reading are solitary activities that throw the psyche back on itself.’6
Oral and Literate Learners Compared 7
Oral Learners Literate Learners
Knowledge source: nature, kinship,
community, elders.
Knowledge source: teachers, printed page,
multimedia.
Enjoys learning in group or community
through participation
Prefers learning quietly as individual in
isolation
Learns best through stories Prefers summaries, lists, principles
Stores truth in remembered stories and
proverbs
Stores truth in written abstracts and
principles
Reasons intuitively Reasons analytically, logically
Enjoys and comfortable with repetition Avoids redundancy and repetition
Relational, genealogical Factual, historical
Holistic (whole is more important than parts) Segmented (deconstructed parts are of
value)
Creative reconstruction of stories and events
in sharing
Verbatim memory and written factual
accounts for sharing
Some characteristics of oral communication:
simple additions of information (lots of ‘ands’) rather than subordinate or hierarchical
ordering (‘when’, ‘thus’, ‘which’ and so on)
formulaic phrases (‘the beautiful princess’, ‘the sturdy oak’)
repetition (because you cannot read back over oral communication)
concrete information and stories rather than abstract ideas or principles
empathetic and participatory rather than objective and distanced
Orality and the Biblical Word
Susan Niditch suggests Israelite culture was neither exclusively oral, nor exclusively literate.
Both approaches influenced the writers of the Hebrew Bible.8 Walter Ong says: ‘Writing from
the beginning did not reduce orality but enhanced it, making it possible to organize the
“principles” or constituents of orality into a scientific “art”, a sequentially ordered body of
6 Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy, 54, 68.
7 J. O. Terry, Basic Bible Storying, 22.
8 Susan Niditch, Oral World and Written Word: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Israel, Westminster/John
Knox Press, 1996.
4
explanation that showed how and why oratory achieved and could be made to achieve its
various specific effects.’9
The Bible itself is clearly a written artefact. But most of the teaching described in the Bible is
non-literate in form. Consider how Jesus could have taught: expounding the Hebrews
Scriptures, offering philosophical reflections and so on. Yet Matthew tells us: ‘Jesus spoke all
these things to the crowd in parables; he did not say anything to them without using a
parable’ (Matthew 13:34 NLT). ‘Jesus used stories all the time … These parables were not good
illustrations to punctuate his points. The stories themselves revealed the hidden mysteries of
God.’10 Walter Ong says:
The Bible is read aloud at liturgical services. For God is thought of always as ‘speaking’
to human beings, not as writing to them. The orality of the mindset in the Biblical text,
even in its epistolary sections, is overwhelming. The Hebrew dabar, which means
word, means also event and thus refers directly to the spoken word. The spoken word
is always an event, a movement in time, completely lacking in the thing-like repose of
the written or printed word. In Trinitarian theology the Second Person of the Godhead
is the Word and the human analogue for the Word here is not the human written
word but the human spoken word. God the Father ‘speaks’ to his Son: he does not
inscribe him. Jesus, the Word of God, left nothing in writing, though he could read and
write (Luke 4:16). ‘Faith comes through hearing’, we read in the Letter to the Romans
(10:17). ‘The letter kills, the spirit [breath, on which rides the spoken word] gives life’
(2 Corinthians 3:6).11
Most people in the early church were illiterate and most Christians did not have direct access
to the Bible. The Bible was heard, recalled and retold.
Today much of our teaching in church is literate in its orientation (sermons, biblical studies).
For non-literate people oral learners even an interactive Bible study can be intimidating. It
feels like an English comprehension exercise. We are invited to examine a text and answers
text-based questions. Directions that lead about from the text (perhaps towards concrete
application) are frowned upon. Even where the process is no longer intimidating, it does not
feel reproducible by non-literate people. Storytelling offers a way of teaching the Bible in a
biblical way that does not rely on appropriating the text of the Bible as a text.
Stories and Communication
We evaluate facts from a distance. Stories draw us in, inviting us to empathise, to participate.
People can argue doctrine and theology. They can even sit with arms crossed listening
to someone’s convincing reasons why they should believe. But when powerful stories
begin to be told, and when a person can identify with another person’s journey, the
arms drop, the defensiveness wanes, and a receptive ear is gained. Faith has become
personal … A sermon tells people what to think. A story forces people to do the
thinking for themselves. It can feel dangerous because it allows for interpretation. But
one of the adjectives used to describe the Holy Spirit is ‘counsellor’. Do we trust our
people and the Holy Spirit enough to allow them to think for themselves? Can we
leave something open-ended, knowing the conclusions might not come until later that
9 Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy, 1982, 9.
10 Mark Miller, Experiential Storytelling: (Re)Discovering Narrative to Communicate God’s Message,
Zondervan, 2003, 39.
11 Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy, 1982, 74.
5
day, week, month, or year? Can we allow people to own the stories? Or do we do all
of the interpreting and leave nothing to the imagination? My belief is that when a
story becomes personal and people begin to become unsettled and challenged by it,
then they have been touched in a place where facts fear to tread. It is a place so
personal that it can spark an inner transformation. (Mark Millar )12
Jesus’ stories contained no references to the law of Moses. In his parables he didn’t
seek to explain the words of previous prophets or teachers. There was often no
reference to Yahweh. What kind of biblical teaching was this! … Jesus’ teaching
ministry was purposefully cryptic, allowing those who sought answers, rather than
those who ‘had all the answers,’ to access the surprising truth of grace … Some would
openly dismiss them as silly children’s stories (particularly the Pharisees and scribes),
others … would be so intrigued that they would have to enquire further. And as Jesus
had already told his disciples earlier, it was this kind of genuine enquiry he was
seeking to evoke (Matt. 7:7). In our attempts to make the Gospel clear, we have often
squeezed all the life out of it. Jesus’ parables were intriguing, open to interpretation,
playful, interesting. (Michael Frost and Alan Hirsch)13
Jesus often taught through stories, particularly parables. Jesus intended them to
challenge the existing Jewish worldview and to provide an alternative picture of
reality that Jesus called ‘the kingdom of God’ … Stories are, actually, peculiarly good at
modifying or subverting other stories and their worldviews. Where head-on attack
would certainly fail, the parable hides the wisdom of the serpent behind the
innocence of the dove, gaining entrance and favour which can then be used to change
assumptions which the hearer would otherwise keep hidden away for safety. (Tom
Wright)14
In other words, we should not evaluate the effectiveness of storytelling simply in terms of
whether people are able to articulate principles they have learnt at the end of a session. That
is not how stories work. They create new perspectives, new values, new sympathies. They
implicate us.
Telling a Good Story
Know the Story: You must know the story inside and out. Be careful you do not edit too much
so the story loses its integrity.
Know your Audience: ‘This missional mind-set places the priority on the hearer, not the teller.
Listen with the ears of those who hear you.’15
Simplify the Story:
limit proper nouns (names) – people will not retain a lot of names so, for example refer to
‘a town’ rather than ‘Capernaum’
consider formulaic references to characters (e.g. Pharaoh the King of Egypt, John the
desert preacher)
limit statistics and technical details
12 Mark Miller, Experiential Storytelling, 37, 41.
13 Michael Frost and Alan Hirsch, The Shaping of Things to Come: Innovation and Mission for the 21st
Century, Hendrickson, 2003, 100.
14 N.T. Wright, The New Testament and the People of God, SPCK, 1996, 40.
15 Mark Miller, Experiential Storytelling, 45.
6
Remember you want people to be able to retell the story for themselves.
Tell the Story (Don’t Preach): ‘What is very important to remember is that listeners prefer
each story to be continuous and uninterrupted from start to finish … Oral learners prefer and
respond better to stories that are delivered without inserted comment or pauses to teach
which interrupt the narrative.’16
Other Pointers
Action words (verbs) move the story forward. Descriptions (adjectives) give vividness.
Conversation (dialogue) delivers drama.
Don’t jump ahead (and give away the climax or punch line).
Anticipate the way listeners will identify with the story.
Use the conflict or problems in the story to hold interest.
What kind of conflict arises in the story? Individuals vs. God? Individual vs. Satan?
Individual vs. Other Individual(s)? Individual vs. Nature? Individual vs. Society? Individual
vs. Himself? God vs. Satan? What are some contemporary ways we see this conflict?
Identify and highlight repetition in the story.
Experiment with variations in delivery: pitch, speed, pauses, volume.
Bridge from previous stories and consider ending with a ‘teaser’ for the following story.
Avoid language that makes us distant from the story (e.g. ‘We see in the text …’
‘Commentators tell us that …’ ‘There are three possible interpretations of …’ ‘In verse 9
…’)
Respect the storytelling conventions of the culture. Think about how significant, true or
religious stories are introduced in the culture. (‘This is part of the story of God’).
‘Take a deep breath and begin. “Now here is the story from God’s word” … At the
conclusion of the story, close with the words, “And that is the end of the story from God’s
Word.”’ 17
Storytelling Options
1. A Creative Retelling
Another perspective. From whose point of view do we view the story? Could you tell the
story from another point of view? (E.g. someone in the crowd, the person who is healed.)
Another setting. What is the setting of the story? Would it be more compelling to use a
new, contemporary setting?
Creative retellings can be powerful, but they have two weaknesses:
They take you away from the biblical text so combine them with a reading of the Bible.
They detract from reproducibility – they make it harder for someone else to retell the
story.
2. A Contextual Retelling
Give the story significance (interpret the story) by telling in a wider context. Set it in the
context of the Bible story as a whole with a few short lines before and/or after. For example:
God made a world of plenty and provision. He provided fruit of every kind for
humanity. But humanity rejected God. Human greed has made the world a place of
scarcity and hunger. Did God leave it like that? No, he sent his own Son, Jesus, on a
rescue mission. On one occasion Jesus spent the whole day teaching 5,000 people …
16 J. O. Terry, Basic Bible Storying, 9.
17 J. O. Terry, Basic Bible Storying, 83.
7
What Jesus did was a picture of God’s coming new world – a world without hunger or
pain. Jesus invites us all to join in God’s great coming feast.
Or bring the story up to date by seeing how the same struggles or themes continue in your
own setting. In other words, integrate the Bible story with our stories by adding your story or
our story as the next ‘chapter’.
Or consider starting with an introduction that sets the audience up to look for meaning(s) in
the story. (Have you ever been afraid? What did you do? Imagine you were facing a den of
hungry lions.)
3. Recall, Retell, Review
Rewrite the story. Keep close to the details in the biblical text. But consider:
simplifying the story (removing details and names of less significant people and places)
highlighting repetition, turning points, tension and eventual resolution
If you can, memorize the story so you can retell it without missing any key points.
After you have told the story:
Recall Ask people When? Where? Who? What? Why? How? This helps people to recall the
story. It also allows you to explain cultural and textual issues (traditional exegesis and
exposition).
Retell Encourage people to retell the story. You could invite someone to retell the story with
help from the group. You could invite people to tell the story in pairs, taking it in
turns to tell a line of the story.
Review Ask some ‘dialogue’ questions to review what we see in the story and how it
implicates us.
When you are telling a story as part of a story set or Bible book begin each session by
reviewing the previous story or stories: ‘Who can remember the story we did last time?’
Dialogue Questions
‘Recall’ questions will generally have a limited right answers (‘What did he do next?’ ‘Where
did this happen?’) . Dialogue questions should be open questions that encourage discussion.
They should invite people to interact with the story (rather than pushing them towards
predetermined answers or principles). You should come up with some dialogue questions that
are specific for each story. But here are some generic ones that can be used for many stories.
What questions do you have about the story?
What do you like or dislike in the story?
How do you think they felt?
How would you have reacted?
What do we learn about God in this story?
What do we learn about human beings in this story?
Can you see any similarities with other parts of the Bible story?
Is there anything in this story that points to Jesus or shows our need for Jesus?
Are there any links to our stories? When have you faced a similar challenge?
How are we like the people in the story?
How does the story challenge or encourage you?
How does this story help us understand what it mean to walk in God’s ways?
When might you tell this story to a Christian?
When might you tell this story to an unbeliever?